|
To all of you who contacted me during the airport
debate I wanted to take this opportunity to get back to you and explain
the choice that I made. While
we were deluged with correspondence arguing passionately both for and
against, I was able to read all of your letters and emails; your arguments
weighed heavily in my decision making. I know many of you are pleased with
the decision made and many are deeply disappointed. I can assure you that
none of us took the decision lightly. I am fully aware of the magnitude of
the decision and spent a great deal of time researching the issue before
coming to my conclusion.
Most important was the decision be based on the long
term future of the city and not on a short term window. To this end I
wanted to get a clear sense of what the likely future was for aviation.
During the recent ICLEI conference on future city sustainability we had
transportation experts from across the world in the City and I took the
opportunity to bend their ears on the subject. Their response was
unanimous: the future for short haul, small aircraft flights such as could
be served by the muni is not good. Transportation in fact is very likely
to move in the opposite direction.
The worst case scenario for me was always continued indecision on this
matter. Many thought after the vote in 1995 that the issue was decided
once and for all, but it seemed to come back every three years with
arguments to reverse the decision to move all scheduled flights to the
international. Every time it was re-debated it made it harder and harder
for the airport to plan for any kind of future and for the businesses that
were there to have any kind of certainty. At minimum I knew that whatever
decision we made had to be clear. It
was also important, with the number of large decisions coming in the near
future such as NAIT and the
LRT
, that we not make one decision today and then make a different decision
three to five years from now.
I know many of you will disagree with me, but I have come to believe that
for the long term future, a downtown airport is not the best use of that
land. I suspect it would be used by fewer and fewer Edmontonians and
ultimately would become a very expensive private airport. It was time to
make a decision.
Two other things are critical. That if we were to
develop the land it should be done by the City with an eye to coming up
with a quality new district rather than an eye to just making a quick buck
off the land. The fact that the City is the land owner and can plan and
manage how it develops gives us the opportunity to do something truly
remarkable. This has been guaranteed in the motion that was passed.
I also feel strongly that we must make an extra effort to preserve and
honour the history of the airport on the site. I realize that we will not
be able to do this in connection with a useable landing strip, but there
are many other things that can and must be done to honour the many whose
histories are embodied in that airport. I promise that I will fight hard
to make sure that that history is recognized, supported and honoured.
And finally, although I had some hesitation with the motion to do it as a
staged closure, for a number of reasons it is the best way to go. No
future use of the airport will happen overnight, and there is no need to
deprive those currently using the airport of its use until there is a need
to do so. That could be many years off before there is a complete closure.
In the meantime the airport will be available to all who are currently
using its runways. It also mitigates the negative effect on the businesses
that have called the airport home by giving them more time to respond to
the future.
I know many of you agree and many of you disagree. It has certainly been
the hardest decision I have been faced with while on Council. It is always
scary to have to cast a vote like this because I am always aware that
despite all the research done I may be wrong. The future cannot be
perfectly predicted. But I felt the most important thing was to make a
clear decision and I have done so with some strong belief that the right
decision has been made.
Thank you again for your letters and emails.
Ben
Henderson
Councillor,
Ward
4
|
|